|
Jane Anger was an English author of the sixteenth century and the first woman to publish a full-length defense of her gender in English. The title of her defense, ''Jane Anger Her Protection For Women'' was published in 1589. In the late sixteenth century, it was rare for women to write and publish on secular, or non-religious, themes. And it was also rare for women to argue against male supremacy. == Life and career == Scholars known virtually nothing about Jane Anger’s life. Jane Anger is known only as the writer of the pamphlet, ''Jane Anger Protection for Women'' (1589),. There was more than one Jane Anger living in England at the time, however, none of them have been identified as the writer of the pamphlet.”〔Randall Martin, Women Writers in Renaissance England: An Annotated Anthology (Great Britain: Pearson Education Ltd, 1997), 81.〕 According to Moira Ferguson, the history of surnames for this period suggest that her surname was probably derived from the Anglicized French “Anjou”,.〔Martin, Women Writers in Renaissance England: An Annotated Anthology, 80.〕 Anne Prescott argues that,” presumably, the Jo. Anger, whose poem on the author appears at the end of the volume, was a relative or spouse.〔Moira Furguson, “Jane Anger,” in First Feminists: British Women Writers 1578-1799 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985, 58.〕Others have suggested that “Jane Anger” was the pseudonym of a male writer. Other evidence suggests that Jane Anger may be a real woman, not a “ventriloquizing man,” and her work breaks free from gender limitations.〔Lynne A. Magnusson, “Dictionary of Literary Biography: Jane Anger (flourished 1589),” Sixteenth-Century British Nondramatic Writers (1994):3, accessed on December 3, 2014.〕 In ''The Crooked Rib'', Francis Lee Utley argues that the anonymous poem, “ye are to yong to bring me in: An old lover to a young gentlewoman” might have provoked Anger’s sharp defense.”〔Magnusson, “Dictionary of Literary Biography: Jane Anger (flourished 1589),”4.〕 == Work == The pamphlet defends women and makes serious claims regarding female’s authorship. For the first time, her text brought a distinctive new voice to English writing, which emphasized the voice of female anger. By developing this innovation, she “transformed the idea of masculine models of composition to invent a female writing style to suite to her enterprise.”〔Joy Ritchie and Kate Ronald, “Jane Anger: From Jane Anger Her Protection for Women…(1589),” in Available Means: An Anthology of Women’s Rhetoric(s) (Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2001), 50-60〕 Some modern commentators argue that, “Anger deliberately reworks her opponent’s misogynist ideas to establish a direct feminine perspective that goes beyond the querelle frameworks.”〔Martin, Women Writers in Renaissance England, 80.〕 Since Jane Anger was the first major female polemicist in English, there is no doubt that Anger shows the interest and value in the creation of feminist consciousness, because in the Middle Ages, the feminist polemic was a favorite topic for academic disputation. Jane Anger’s pamphlet, Her Protection of Women, (1589) was a response to the male-authored text of Thomas Orwin, Book His Surfeit in Love. Pamela Joseph Benson argues that, “the Protection remains undifferentiated from other interventions in the querelle because it relies largely on the traditional issue of sexual behavior to evaluate woman’s moral nature.”〔Joy Ritchie and Kate Ronald, “Jane Anger: From Jane Anger Her Protection for Women…(1589),” 50.〕 Anger’s arguments are a compilation of allusions, sayings, and some examples that match to those in the Book his Surfeit. She exposes the mono-gendered basis of the Surfeiter’s “objective” or “natural” assertions. Anger’s text responds to the male-dominated rhetoric of the female gender, passionately defends and attacks the male writes' complaint stating that he is “surfeit”, or “sick with sensual indulgence of women.”〔Jane Anger, Her Protection for Women To Defend Them Against the Scandalous Reportes Of a Late Surfeiting Lover, and All Other Like Venerians that Complaine so To Bee Overcloyed with Women’s Kindness. London: Printed by Richard Jones and Thomas Orwin, 1589.〕 Through defending her intervention in the debate, she constantly touches the reader’s awareness that women were not confident enough to express their own opinions or “masculine” emotions. Her pamphlet opens with a critique of masculine rhetorical practices, especially paying an attention to their overemphasis on “manner” over “matter.” She immediately targets a contradiction between the high value male writers, who place women as a stimulus to their creativity and the decline of women. She touches the notion of the mythmaking that accompanies men’s claims to inspiration: “If they may one encroach so far into our presence as they may but see the lining of our outermost garment, they straight think that Apollo honors them.”〔 Jane Anger, Her Protection for Women To Defend Them Against the Scandalous Reportes Of a Late Surfeiting Lover, and All Other Like Venerians that Complaine so To Bee Overcloyed with Women’s Kindness. London: Printed by Richard Jones and Thomas Orwin, 1589.〕 She describes the details of how men’s ignorance of women allow them to misread women’s behaviors, particularly, in regard to sex, she writes: “If we will not suffer them to smell on our smocks, they will snatch at our petticoats; but if our honest natures cannot away with that uncivil kind of jesting, then we are coy. Yet if w bear with their rudeness and be somewhat modestly familiar with them, they will straight make matter of nothing, blazing abroad that they have surfeited with love, and …telling the manner how.”〔Jane Anger, Her Protection for Women.〕 Jane Anger describes her work as “that which my chooloricke vaine hath rashly set downe…it was ANGER that did write it.”〔Jane Anger, Her Protection for Women.〕 The first “epistle” is devoted to Gentlewomen making an apology for a female’s choleric directness. In the second “epistle” she blames “railing” male speech: Fie on the falshoode of men, whose minds goe off a madding, & whose tongues can not so soone be wagging, but straight they fal a railing…shall not Anger stretch the vaines of her braines, the stringes of her fingers, and the listes of her modestie, to answere theire Surfeitings: Yes truly.〔Jane Anger, Her Protection for Women. 〕 Then, using the Surfeiter’s own vein, she uses the comic potential in the discourse, which enables her readers to laught at her, as well as at the Surfeiter. Thus, “it confirms the misogynist reading of women who speak out as shrewish.”〔Anna Bayman, “Female Voices in Early Seventeenth Century Pamphlet Literature,” Women and Writing, c.1340-c.1650: The Domestication of Print Culture (2010) 196-210,accessed on December 3, 2014. 〕 She uses a female speech as comically baffling and witty in its echoes of logical and scholastic discourse:
Importantly, Anger repeatedly points out that men continue to misinterpret women because male writers “assume” that women are not capable of entering the male sphere of the printed word to challenge them: “their slanderous tongues are so short, that the time wherein they have lavished out their words freely hath been so long, and they know we cannot catch hold of them to pull them out, and they think we will not write to reprove their lying lips.”〔Magnusson, “Dictionary of Literary Biography: Jane Anger (flourished 1589),”5.〕 Anger tries to answer some general male charges against the looseness of women’s moral, arguing that men’s own “filthy lust” causes them to “invent” an idea of women’s lascivious nature. Above all, as the counter argument to the Surfeiter’s account that women seduce men only to make the men’s lives miserable, Anger proposes her own story. According to Anger’s view of courtship: that men prey on women, “If we clothe ourselves in sackcloth, and truss up our hair in dishclouts, Venerians will nevertheless pursue their pastime. If we hide our breasts, it must be with leather, for no cloth can keep their long nails out off our bosoms.”〔Magnusson, “Dictionary of Literary Biography: Jane Anger (flourished 1589),”5-6. 〕 Anger’s way of caricaturing the Surfeiter allowed her to produce an imaginative and unique piece of writing. At the end of her pamphlet, though Anger blames the Surfeiter for his views, she admits the fact that she had the pleasure using his style. Anger’s work is full of misogynist * materials, which were circulating in popular prose romances of her time, including some of Greene’s and John Lyly’s works. Scholars have their own interpretations weather she should be called “feminist,” “protofeminist,” or “prowoman,” but her work definitely opened up a new possibility for women writers of the sixteenth century. 〔Magnusson, “Dictionary of Literary Biography: Jane Anger (flourished 1589),”5-6.〕 A sample from Jane Anger's ''Her Protection for Women'' Fie on the falsehood of men, whose minds go oft a –madding and whose tongues cannot so soon be wagging but straight they fall a-railing. Was there ever any so abused, so slandered, so railed upon, or so wickedly handled undeservedly, as are we women? Will the gods permit it, the goddesses stay their punishing judgments, and we ourselves not pursue their undoings for such devilish practices? O Paul’s steeple and Charing Cross!〔Jane Anger, Her Protection for Women.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Jane Anger」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|